On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote:
> Robert Krüger <krueger <at> lesspain.de> writes: > > > I still think the text is fine as it will > > hopefully lead to people adding something like > > yadif before the filter > > Which - if I am correct - is plain wrong (or at > least only the second-best option). > > Plain wrong is a pretty strong statement in this context. > Of course I may be wrong (I cannot test atm) but if > deinterleaving does not lead to funny results (in > which case a more complicated filtergraph could be > used) it will be faster than yadif and will lead to > better results quality-wise. If you want me to respond to this you have yet to explain exactly how your approach works. I asked a concrete question regarding that in my last email. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
