On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <ceho...@ag.or.at> wrote:
> Robert Krüger <krueger <at> lesspain.de> writes: > > > Do you mean processing the top and bottom fields > > as separate progressive > > Yes. > (Sorry, I thought this is what "deinterleaving and > interleaving" means.) > > > streams? > > Not necessarily "streams", just not processing them > interlaced but deinterleaved. > If this leads to shadows, then I would suggest to > use two framerate instances. > > I understand the variant with processing the fields as separate streams with two framerate instances, but not the other one. One would have to test but the more I think about it, I think it could very well work and result in better quality as the deinterlacing/reinterlacing obviously destroys motion information. One would probably have to make tests with interlaced footage that contains a lot of motion. It would certainly be interesting to see that filter chain, though. I haven't worked with the il filter at all, so I would have to read up on that first. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
