On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:07:56 -0500 compn <te...@mi.rr.com> wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:24:35 -0500 > "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Anything else? Why not just implement these in ffmpeg directly? > > because (i'm guessing) they are developing libyami with other projects, > not ffmpeg. > > i know everyone wants to reinvent the wheels here, but also that may > have a detrimental effect on development if nothing gets in except > ffmpeg-style-wheels. > > i'm not sure how useful the codec wrapper will be, but it does have > features we dont yet. if no one wants these libs , i'm not going to > push the issue.
How about the fact that libyami reinvented the wheel long after ffmpeg? Look at all those codec parsers they have. There are many things that seem to stink about this lib. Having a C++ API is my least favorite one. So I guess I can say that in my opinion, the ffmpeg native support should be improved, instead of duplicating functionality all over the place. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
