On Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:24:35 -0500 "Ronald S. Bultje" <rsbul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anything else? Why not just implement these in ffmpeg directly? because (i'm guessing) they are developing libyami with other projects, not ffmpeg. i know everyone wants to reinvent the wheels here, but also that may have a detrimental effect on development if nothing gets in except ffmpeg-style-wheels. i'm not sure how useful the codec wrapper will be, but it does have features we dont yet. if no one wants these libs , i'm not going to push the issue. -compn _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
