On Fri, 9 Jan 2015 17:17:00 -0500 compn <te...@mi.rr.com> wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:44:32 +0100 > wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > What's the point of using this library, if ffmpeg already has > > most of the hw decoding infrastructure itself? > > probably so we dont have to maintain every single little hw decoding > and encoding feature , and libyami will do this for us.
Maintaining decoders is the point of this project. Besides, there are some more things missing from the patch. > same thing libstagefright does for us. so we dont have to test our > ffmpeg hw decoders against every single piece of hardware. The libstagefright decoding wrapper is apparently a piece of shit. Who even uses it? > the future plans for libyami are pretty nice, > https://www.mail-archive.com/libva@lists.freedesktop.org/msg02826.html I don't see any nice things. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
