I understand you concern. The wrapper doesn't help much to ffmpeg itself, however, it benefits much to the apps uses ffmpeg, to pick up hw capability for codec.
-----Original Message----- From: ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf Of Ronald S. Bultje Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 9:49 AM To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] add libyami.cpp for h264 decoding by libyami Hi, On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 5:30 PM, wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 9 Jan 2015 17:17:00 -0500 > compn <te...@mi.rr.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2015 14:44:32 +0100 > > wm4 <nfx...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > What's the point of using this library, if ffmpeg already has most > > > of the hw decoding infrastructure itself? > > > > probably so we dont have to maintain every single little hw decoding > > and encoding feature , and libyami will do this for us. > > Maintaining decoders is the point of this project. Yeah, I also share this same concern. What's next, a gstreamer wrapper? Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
