On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 07:42:00PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote: > > Hi Reinhard > > > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:33:48PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> > >> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > >> >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >> >> >> Hi, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port > >> >> >> libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not > >> >> >> test it (for lack of a stand-alone test program) yet, but at > >> >> >> least I got it to build. > >> >> > > >> >> > you could try to test by buiding ffmpeg as a whole but disable asm > >> >> > everywhere except libpostproc > >> >> > that might allow "easy" testing though fate or ffmpeg with libavfilter > >> >> > >> >> Is http://git.videolan.org/?p=libpostproc.git still maintained? > >> > > >> > AFAIK, no, it seems the last commit is 2 years ago > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> The Debian package tracks that repository, and ideally we could > >> >> collect the postproc patches there. > >> > > >> > libpostproc was and is maintained in > >> > git://source.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.git > >> > >> So the promise given in > >> https://lists.libav.org/pipermail/libav-devel/2012-February/020712.html > >> doesn't hold anymore? > > > > Can you be a bit more specific ? what "promise" by whom exactly do > > you speak of ? > > > > The promise of having a maintained stand-alone libpostproc. > > >> > >> Any chance to make you reconsider reviving the standalone libpostproc.git? > > > > From what i remember there where some problems with that repository > > so actually maintaining it would probably imply first recreating it > > > > for example try to build a old revission: > > > > git checkout a792a836e3d9ef6f1f311604b38095e587282ca7 > > (this is libpostproc/master~20 ATM) > > ./configure > > -bash: ./configure: No such file or directory > > > > this is a problem for anyone maintaining the code as for example > > git bisect > > would not be usable at all > > > > or if you do a git show > > commit a792a836e3d9ef6f1f311604b38095e587282ca7 > > Merge: 1d261c2 7f1c286 7391383 8f2dfd0 8cf4ef5 59d8d9c > > > > Its a commit with 6 ancestors, no commit in FFmpeg or Libav has 6 > > ancestors > > > > So really, if someone wants to maintain or use libpostproc.git, first > > these things need to be fixed > > > > but i dont understand why you dont just take libpostproc > > from where its developed, tested and used ? > > > > but if it helps i guess we could copy the libpostproc from FFmpeg > > over the one in libpostproc.git (which is what reimar suggested) > > libpostproc.git was only intended to be a copy of FFmpeg with libs > > other than libpostproc removed anyway. > > > > Would this help you ? > > At the end of the day, I need a source tarball that contains > maintained sources of a stand-alone libpostproc. I don't care too much > how it is created, as long as it doesn't result in code-duplication > with existing sources in Debian.
would it work if libpostproc could be build and installed standalone from ffmpeg git / ffmpeg release tarballs? i havent really investigated it but it seems with the 2 line patch below one can achive that with ./configure --enable-gpl --disable-all --enable-shared --enable-postproc && make (it also would need changing #includes "..." to <...> to use system installed libavutil headers) this seems a easier path than maintaining libpostproc.git if it would work for debian, if not iam sure we will find another solution like updating libpostproc.git. diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 57f6a91..63423bf 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ FFLIBS-$(CONFIG_POSTPROC) += postproc FFLIBS-$(CONFIG_SWRESAMPLE) += swresample FFLIBS-$(CONFIG_SWSCALE) += swscale -FFLIBS := avutil +FFLIBS-$(CONFIG_AVUTIL) += avutil DATA_FILES := $(wildcard $(SRC_PATH)/presets/*.ffpreset) $(SRC_PATH)/doc/ffprobe.xsd EXAMPLES_FILES := $(wildcard $(SRC_PATH)/doc/examples/*.c) $(SRC_PATH)/doc/examples/Makefile $(SRC_PATH)/doc/examples/README diff --git a/configure b/configure index 7de07c3..7a3764f 100755 --- a/configure +++ b/configure @@ -2614,7 +2614,7 @@ avdevice_deps="avformat avcodec avutil" avfilter_deps="avutil" avformat_deps="avcodec avutil" avresample_deps="avutil" -postproc_deps="avutil gpl" +postproc_deps="gpl" swresample_deps="avutil" swscale_deps="avutil" [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know nothing. -- Socrates
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
