On 04.09.2014, at 05:33, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> >>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port >>>>> libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not >>>>> test it (for lack of a stand-alone test program) yet, but at >>>>> least I got it to build. >>>> >>>> you could try to test by buiding ffmpeg as a whole but disable asm >>>> everywhere except libpostproc >>>> that might allow "easy" testing though fate or ffmpeg with libavfilter >>> >>> Is http://git.videolan.org/?p=libpostproc.git still maintained? >> >> AFAIK, no, it seems the last commit is 2 years ago >> >> >>> >>> The Debian package tracks that repository, and ideally we could >>> collect the postproc patches there. >> >> libpostproc was and is maintained in >> git://source.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.git > > So the promise given in > https://lists.libav.org/pipermail/libav-devel/2012-February/020712.html > doesn't hold anymore? > > Any chance to make you reconsider reviving the standalone libpostproc.git?
Seems a bit bit pointless when it has exactly 0 contributors. >> please use that for the debian package > > I fear that's not feasible at this point. Brute-force sync with cp then? Or better just merge, it seems to have been created with git filter-branch so that might just work, but I don't know how much effort that would be. But with no contributors it doesn't seem particularly viable as a stand-alone project. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
