On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port >> >> libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not >> >> test it (for lack of a stand-alone test program) yet, but at >> >> least I got it to build. >> > >> > you could try to test by buiding ffmpeg as a whole but disable asm >> > everywhere except libpostproc >> > that might allow "easy" testing though fate or ffmpeg with libavfilter >> >> Is http://git.videolan.org/?p=libpostproc.git still maintained? > > AFAIK, no, it seems the last commit is 2 years ago > > >> >> The Debian package tracks that repository, and ideally we could >> collect the postproc patches there. > > libpostproc was and is maintained in > git://source.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.git
So the promise given in https://lists.libav.org/pipermail/libav-devel/2012-February/020712.html doesn't hold anymore? Any chance to make you reconsider reviving the standalone libpostproc.git? > please use that for the debian package I fear that's not feasible at this point. -- regards, Reinhard _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
