On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:22:43PM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> as discussed in IRC, I was trying to minimal-invasively port > >> libpostproc (the Debian source package) to x32¹. I could not > >> test it (for lack of a stand-alone test program) yet, but at > >> least I got it to build. > > > > you could try to test by buiding ffmpeg as a whole but disable asm > > everywhere except libpostproc > > that might allow "easy" testing though fate or ffmpeg with libavfilter > > Is http://git.videolan.org/?p=libpostproc.git still maintained?
AFAIK, no, it seems the last commit is 2 years ago > > The Debian package tracks that repository, and ideally we could > collect the postproc patches there. libpostproc was and is maintained in git://source.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.git please use that for the debian package We also have a testing infrastructure in place for ffmpeg.git which tests libpostproc on a wide varity of platforms, libpostproc.git lacks that. And anyone using postprocessing with FFmpeg also tests the code so bugs in postproc in ffmpeg.git should be quickly found, reported and fixes. Thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB He who knows, does not speak. He who speaks, does not know. -- Lao Tsu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
