On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:23:12PM +0200, wm4 wrote: > On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 16:30:14 +0200 > Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:53:55PM +0200, wm4 wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 23:33:48 -0400 > > > Reinhard Tartler <siret...@gmail.com> wrote: [...] > > > > Iam not saying iam against it, just that it seems very strange to me > > > > If people want we could revive libpostproc.git, it just seemed easier > > to me if people use libpostproc from FFmpeg > > > > [...] > > Feel free to create your own separate libpostproc git repo based on > ffmpeg.
If people are happy with libpostproc.git as it is, i surely can try to remember to cherry pick changes into it, but i dont know how to test it beyond build testing, also i dont volunteer to work on commits which dont apply cleanly or dont work when applied ATM, theres some version.h related commit that doesnt apply, that would need to be ported [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Breaking DRM is a little like attempting to break through a door even though the window is wide open and the only thing in the house is a bunch of things you dont want and which you would get tomorrow for free anyway
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
