Ed, the standard range (=cheapest) model 3 is listed with an
optimistic range estimate of 220 mi so the available battery capacity
is likely in the 50s kWh.
Since this was a rental, the capacity has likely degraded from abuse
but let's say it is still 50kWh.
You charged from 9 to 80% so 71%, this means that the charging of a
50kWh pack should have been: 71% of 50kWh = 35.5 kWh so it is likely
that the battery of that model 3 is deteriorated below 50 kWh or that
the SoC estimation software is off, which is possible but unlikely.
Driving distance depends on a lot of things, as you probably know. The
terrain, ambient temp and especially the use of HVAC will all affect
the range. If the available capacity is indeed deteriorated to ~45 kWh
and the driving that you did is below the average 3 mi/kWh then a full
battery will only give you half the rated range so closer to 110 mi
instead of the optimal 220.
Then, when you "super"charge to 80% and keep a minimum 20% buffer,
your available range to drive around is about 60 miles which is
consistent with your report.
Hope this helps,
Cor.

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 8:44 AM EV List Lackey via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:
>
> On 22 Jan 2025 at 6:59, Edward Thorpe via EV wrote:
>
> > Why so little range?
>
> As they say, your EV mileage may vary.  It depends on your driving style,
> terrain, ambient temperature, even wind speed and direction.  The tires
> could be underinflated.  The brakes might be dragging. Bearings could to too
> tight.
>
> There was also something of a kerfuffle a while back about Teslas'
> instrumentation overestimating their range.  Let's see if I can find an
> article.
>
> OK, here you go:
>
> https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/07/tesla-exaggerated-ev-range-so-
> much-that-drivers-thought-cars-were-broken/
>
> or shortcut https://cntp.me/OABkLCo
>
> There's a good reason that charge meters in all EVs are often called
> "guessometers"!  I have to say though that our Renault Zoe's estimates are
> usually fairly close to reality.
>
> Actual Tesla owners (I'm not one) will probably have more ideas.
>
> > Why so slow [charging]? Is something wrong with this Tesla?
>
> Possibly, but I don't think it's uncommon for EVs to charge more slowly than
> rated.
>
> > Also it´s unnerving driving with only the percent gauge for range, no
> > odometer visible
>
> I guess that's down to Tesla's interior styling choices.
>
> I prefer the much more traditional instrument panel layout in our Zoe, quite
> similar to the layout of its ICEV cousin, Clio. Only the media stuff and the
> car setup menus are on the touchscreen.
>
> In the end, it's a matter of personal preference.
>
> With a Tesla, you get what you prefer, as long as you prefer what Elon Musk
> prefers. :-)
>
> David Roden, EVDL moderator & general lackey
>
> To reach me, don't reply to this message; I won't get it.  Use my
> offlist address here : http://evdl.org/help/index.html#supt
>
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>
>      A pioneer wanted to cut a tree down that didn't cost him any-
>      thing, but he never did plant one. He wanted to plow up land
>      that should have been left to grass. He thought it was nature
>      he was living off of, but it was really future generations he
>      was living off of.
>
>                                                   -- Will Rogers
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>
> _______________________________________________
> Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
>
_______________________________________________
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/

Reply via email to