On 11/12/2016 08:29 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Back again;
>
> I stuck the 2nd one back in, right way to, but I guess it did not survive
> the reversed polarity, it can only pull down about half a milliamp.  I
> have 7 more of them so I will use new ones for the last 2, A/B.
>
> But watching the one in the index position, I note that they stay in the
> last state, but does that affect the index adversely?
>
>
Yes, they have a flip-flop that is driven by a comparator 
that checks the difference between the two sensors
in each unit.  So, they DO latch, that is the behavior as 
per the data sheet.

Now, with LinuxCNC, all you need is consistent operation in 
ONE direction only.  For instance, in a rigid tapping 
operation, the spindle encoder is synched to the index at 
the beginning of the operation and then the encoder is 
allowed to count up and down as the tap progresses in and 
then backs out.  The spindle encoder is NOT resynched during 
the whole operation.

It is pretty clear that the index pulse would pick up the 
opposite side of the hole or notch when running the opposite 
direction, but that should not be a problem as mentioned above.

It also seems that the A-B quadrature might slip one 
quadrature count when the spindle reverses, but would then 
slip the other way when reversing again.  And, I'm not sure 
that would actually occur, either.  Anyway, a tiny slip in 
the spindle count should not be much of a problem in most cases.

I've rigid tapped thousands of 4-40 holes with combo 
drill-taps without any problem, using the ATS667 sensors.

Jon

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to