On 8 May 2012 21:38, gene heskett <[email protected]> wrote: >> I believe that FF0 + I is the way to go. WIth FF0 set to rpm/duty >> cycle and a much smaller I than you currently have to take up the >> error. > > Would that not require a dynamic, dependent on speed, FF0 then? Since rps > can easily go from .5 to 40 if its full speed capability is used. That is > a fairly wide, and likely the topp 2/3rds of it never used, but... > > Can this FF0 be derived from the encoder?
Either I don't understand the question, or you don't understand FF0. Assuming the former, can you re-phrase it? -- atp The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
