On 23 July 2010 13:27, James Louis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the reply Kirk. Having explained it, would you (or anyone) mind > translating the following generic sample to "net" without deleting any signal > names? :
I am curious about why you wish to retain both signal names? The signal will only ever take one value, after all. (I am actually not entirely sure why we have signal names at all, other than making Halscope a little easier to setup) Choose a signal name that suits all the uses of the signal, and just have one name. -- atp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
