That's where mag mounts come in real handy.  I have a 2" depth gauge 
that I used on my machine.  Mis-calculated the first run.  Good thing it 
was magnetically attached rather than clamped on...

Mark

On 04/07/2010 08:33 PM, Dave wrote:
> In my experience with steppers that are running on the edge
> (mechanically or electrically), they almost never lose steps the same
> amount in both directions.
>
> Best thing I can think of doing is to put a 1" dial indicator on the
> questionable axis,  write a test program or better yet, patch an
> existing one, so the axis deflects the indicator and pauses there,  then
> goes away from the indicator and runs a lengthy program away from the
> indicator then have it come back and touch the indicator at the end of
> the run.  If you do that right, you can loop the program and let it run
> for a while, if anything is out of wack, that will show up as a changing
> indicator position.
>
> You can work the home thing out also, but the dial indicator thing is is
> a lot more flexible IMO and works on almost all machines..
>
> If your machine is way out of wack, be careful how you mount your
> indicator so it doesn't get wiped out if the machine is erractic.
>
> Dave
>
> On 4/7/2010 4:39 PM, Belli Button wrote:
>> Statistically you will loose as many steps going forward as you will going
>> backwards, sending the machine to 0,0 will not guarantee that you have not
>> lost and made up steps throughout your job.
>>
>> Greg
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Slavko Kocjancic"<[email protected]>
>> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"<[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2010 5:38 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Homming error
>>
>>
>>
>>> 2010/4/7 dave<[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>>> The accuracy of that system depends on how good your home switch is.
>>>>
>>>> I've always used a dial indicator against the spindle for that type of
>>>> measurement. Same concept but easier since you don't have to home.
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Emc-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to