This machine was built by the OEM with a 2 to 1 gear box on each axis. I 
believe you would have a hard time moving this much mass around without gear 
reduction (and not blowing up motors) at 300 IPM without them. Planetary 
gear boxes have very little backlash if any.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jon Elson" <[email protected]>
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 5:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] G52 and Fanuc conversion to EMC


> Paul Keeton wrote:
>> Gene,
>>
>>             Do you (or anyone else) see any any issue with using a 
>> separate
>> encoder and leaving the tach on the motor alone?
> If you DO have a tach on the motor, then you are golden!
>>  I have seen this done on
>> other servo systems with great reliability. Normally backlash is not an
>> issue unless it is an excessive amount on those systems. You simply don't
>> use backlash comp if there is a scale on the machine. You may have to if
>> your encoder is on the screw. Almost definitely if your encoder is on the
>> motor and you have a gear box.
> The tach converter is only desired if there is NO tach present, it is
> clearly a second choice.
> Also, a gearbox on the motor is a terrible idea.  Toothed belt reduction
> works quite well and avoids the backlash problem.
> Backlash compensation is also a bad idea, FAAAAR better to remove the
> backlash as much as possible.
>
> Jon
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
> 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to