Roger Swift wrote:
> Jon,
> The mill is larger than a Bridgeport. Its a 7,000# Tree Journeyman 300 with a
> 12X26X6 envelope and a 500# part capacity. The motors, reduction (about 
> 2.5:1),
> ball screws and encoder counts were not changed in the conversion to Mach3. 
> The
> original amps, servo dynamics, were rated for 20 amps continuous and 45 amps
> surge. The machine works OK with Gecko's but is dreadfully slow. Mach3 has an
> excellent CV algorithm that almost entirely eliminates corner rounding even 
> for
> slow axis and acceleration.
>
>   
OK, so your problem is not acceleration but speed.  Let's do some simple 
arithmetic to see what is going on.
Assuming a 5 TPI ballscrew and 2.5:1 reduction, then you would need 1250 
motor RPM for each 100 IPM of movement.
What speeds are you being limited to?  You might be limited by the step 
pulse rate your computer can produce, not the motor/drive/power supply 
combination.  What is the volt/RPM rating of the motors?

Jon

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to