Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: >> To have a defcustom that let you choose preferred method. Whether the >> default should be changed I don't know. > > We don't need a defcustom if we can assign a different keybinding to > each of them.
Perhaps. Unless C-c C-c should reflect "my" preferred method. >>> This is not possible ATM because it doesn't handle inline footnotes at >>> all (this requires some work in "org-src.el", since >>> `org-src--edit-element' wasn't designed to edit inline objects), and, >> >> There's no need IMO. ATM it moves to the second colon and I don't see >> other logical ways to handle it. > > You can reference inline footnotes too: > > [fn:label] refers to [fn:label:definition] > > and you may want to edit definition from [fn:label]. Right. I had not thought of that. >> C-c C-c would then depend on a defcustom, I guess. At least it's a pity >> if C-c C-c only works in some cases, e.g. "if not narrowed". > > If remote editing is improved, it can become the default for C-c C-c > when on a footnote reference. C-c C-o can jump between the definition > and the reference. We can remove C-c '. I guess that's fine. Still, someone who never uses narrows may find jump better, especially for short documents. If the org-src window can be configured to show less than a fullscreen I guess I would have no concerns with this proposal. Thanks, Rasmus -- There are known knowns; there are things we know that we know
