Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> writes: > The problem is that narrow can be time-consuming to recreate.
This is why we shouldn't mess with it in the first place. > Wouldn't it only find definition in the same file? If you use a popup > indirect buffer narrowed to the footnote-definition in question I don't > think these problems can exist. In any case, this would seem similar to > the way ob handles code blocks. Good idea. I didn't thought about using "org-src.el", but, albeit not perfect, it goes a long way towards avoiding these problems. I toyed a bit with that. Now C-' on a (non inline) footnote reference should edit it in a dedicated buffer. Feedback welcome. Regards,
