Nicolas Goaziou <m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes: >> Wouldn't it only find definition in the same file? If you use a popup >> indirect buffer narrowed to the footnote-definition in question I don't >> think these problems can exist. In any case, this would seem similar to >> the way ob handles code blocks. > > Good idea. I didn't thought about using "org-src.el", but, albeit not > perfect, it goes a long way towards avoiding these problems. > > I toyed a bit with that. Now C-' on a (non inline) footnote reference > should edit it in a dedicated buffer. > > Feedback welcome.
I added this to org.texi. Note, C-c ' will fail in the following example 'cause the fn definition does not have contents-end. I started to try fix this but feel free to beat me to it. I likely will not have time to look more into it until the weekend. foo[fn:1] * Footnotes [fn:1] —Rasmus -- This is the kind of tedious nonsense up with which I will not put
