Bastien writes: > Achim Gratz <strom...@nexgo.de> writes: > >>> Can you tell a bit more about what's wrong with the test? >> >> There is nothing wrong with those tests. > > I meant: can you tell me how the tests fail?
They don't produce the result they are supposed to produce. > I'm interested in the answer. make BTEST_RE='\\(header-arg-defaults\\|property-accumulation\\)' test-dirty >>> If the patch is good and the tests are outdated, I'd rather >>> fix the tests than revert the patch to re-revert it again. >> >> No, the patch is bad, otherwise it wouldn't break the tests. > > Sorry, I don't buy this. I'm not selling anything. > Or maybe explain me why the patch is wrong. It breaks property inheritance and accumulation. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada