Aloha Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes:
> t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
>
>> I think there might be a problem with the regular expression for
>> captions on line 703 or org-e-latex.el. I have a dim understanding of
>> regular expressions and the various parsers, but I suspect the problem
>> is in this part: [^][].
>>
>> At any rate, this input:
>> #+CAPTION: [An example photograph]{An example photograph}.
>> #+LABEL: fig:photo
>
> The regexp isn't the problem here. But this all means that I'm breaking
> a golden rule: never parse something already parsed.
>
> Anyway, I have switched caption keyword to the dual keywords
> category. That means is syntax is now like results keywords' which can
> have an optional string (a hash in this case) before their main value.
>
> To put it simply, caption syntax can now be:
>
> #+caption: long name
> #+caption[]: long name
> #+caption[short name]: long name
>
> much like
>
> #+results[hash]: name
>
> Though,
>
> #+caption[something]:
>
> is equivalent to no caption since the main value is mandatory.
This input:
#+CAPTION[An example photograph]: An example photograph.
#+NAME: fig:photo
for me, yields:
\caption{\label{fig:photo}An example photograph}
I was expecting:
\caption[An example photograph]{\label{fig:photo}An example photograph}
>
> As a side note, #+label has been deprecated in favor of #+name (though
> the former is immediately translated into the latter at parse time).
I agree it is a good idea to abstract this from the LaTeX backend.
>
>
> Regards,
All the best,
Tom
--
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com
