András Major <andras.g.ma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > > > Your file uses #+data: where I use #+tblname: -- which one is the > > > official one? I have the impression that it's #+data:, but I haven't > > > come across that in the manual or elsewhere before. If #+tblname: > > > isn't supposed to be used as a target for a variable in the code > > > block, then we should make sure that it *never* behaves as such. > > > > > > > In the interest of backwards compatibility and convenience there are a > > number of equivalent options here, see the value of the > > `org-babel-data-names' variable for all possible names. > > OK, in that case the example still doesn't work for me. Whether I use > #+data or #+tblname, specifying the :noexport: tag in the section > containing the table causes the HTML export to report the error > "reference 'table1' not found in this buffer". > > As Bastien pointed out earlier, I'm not talking about simple > evaluation (C-cC-c) but, specifically, export (HTML and PDF tried so > far). >
This is probably caused by org-export-preprocess-string: it does things in a certain order, and it probably kills the :noexport: stuff before it gets to the evaluation of the source block. It might be possible to change the order (ISTR a couple of cases, where behavior was changed by doing exactly this), but it's probably fraught with peril: approach with caution. Nick PS. Warning: the above is a guess: it may have nothing to do with reality.
