Eric S Fraga <e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
> Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>
> Hi Eric! ;-)
>
>> So the problem is that the results are inserted as a separate block,
>> when you want them to be inserted inline? If so perhaps using an
>> "inline" block http://orgmode.org/manual/Structure-of-code-blocks.html
>> would result in the desired behavior.
>>
>> Please let me know if I've misunderstood the question.
>
> Yes and no. I *do* want the effect that is achieved by using an inline
> block but I do *not* want to write the whole block inline
I find the following pattern
#+source: big-block
#+begin_src emacs-lisp :exports none
"something complex"
#+end_src
Here is some text with src_emacs-lisp[:var it=big-block]{it} in the
middle.
to be helpful in these situations.
> as that can be difficult to do or, at the very best, hard to read even
> if possible... I would like to invoke/evaluate, inline, a particular
> source code block with a specific value of an argument.
>
> From the documentation, I don't see how to "call" a src block inline.
> That's why I thought of using =#+call=. Am I missing something?
>
nope, there is no way to issue an in-line call, although maybe this
wouldn't be the worst idea if only for the added brevity over an inline
code block.
I'll put it on my long-term low-priority stack. :)
Cheers -- Eric
>
> Thanks,
> eric
--
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/
