On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> wrote:

> Bastien <b...@altern.org> wrote:
>
> > Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> writes:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
> > >> I changed the [Orgmode] tag to [O].
> > >
> > > Couldn't you just drop it?
> > >
> > > Seriously, this [O] is useless and ridiculous.
> >
> Not to me.
>
>
Me either.

The emails from this mailing list along account for 80% of my daily emails.
With a tag and using gmail shortcuts, I can go down the list pressing j for
next message and x to select it as I skim the titles to see if anything
strikes me as of interest. When I have them all, I scan the senders and
subjects once more to catch any accidental selections and then press # to
delete. It would suck to actually read every subject to interpret it as
mailing list or not *and* also be deciding if I wanted to open it.

With the tag I just look for keywords like babel, beamer, lists, etc. to see
if I think I'm interested. Mostly... I'm not.


>
> [fn:1] or [Org] or [O] - I would have preferred [Org] but I'm willing to
> live with [O].
>

Yeah, [O] seems weird to me even though there's nothing really wrong with
it... I like [Org] more :)


John


>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Reply via email to