If the lists were split, I likely would have never submitted my first patch. I've learned more about programming and computing from the org-mode list than any other list. I'm in favor of the status quo.
I make heavy use of mail tags. I almost always delete [PATCH] mails immediately, and pay special attention to [babel] mails, since I'm starting to use it more heavily. With modern filters and thread scoring, splitting may not be that beneficial on the whole. On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Bastien <b...@altern.org> wrote: > Hi Julien, > > Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> writes: > >> How about splitting the mailing list in a user and a development list? > > I am in favor of using a [DEV] tag and stick to one single list. > > The path from users to developers (and to core Org developers) is > a continuum, keeping this continuum on one list is a good thing. > > What other people think? > > -- > Bastien > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > -- Jeffrey Horn http://www.failuretorefrain.com/jeff/ _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
