"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <arne_...@web.de> writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > > Russell Adams <rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com> writes: > >> Did Org break your Org editing experience in Emacs for your Org files, >> or did this change just break some of the finer formatting details of >> your exported Org file? > > The change to electric indent broke my workflow badly (always having to > undo the indentation after every new headline), and it took long until I > found out how to avoid that. > That is probably a good example of how change can be imposed by external events outside the control of org-mode. While I would agree that more analysis of that change may have resulted in better initial documentation and in turn, less inconvenience to users. that is only obvious now with the benefit of hindsight. The fact it was a change triggered by a change in Emacs rather than a change initiated by org demonstrates that at times, org has to adapt to its evolving environment. While this change may have 'broken' your workflow, the previous behaviour was breaking other users workflows because org did not honour electric-indent-mode and was not consistent with other core emacs modes.
