TEC <tecos...@gmail.com> writes: > <#multipart type=alternative><#part type=text/plain>
Please don't send HTML. > Inline LaTeX, and Environments are indeed different. I failed to consider that > there may be additional complications if switching an inline environment to an > environment. Quite frankly I’m not too sure how org handles an environment in > the middle of a line. I’ll do some quick tests. You cannot have an environment in the middle of a line. > I was also referring to \( \) → \[ \] (inline to inline) as something one > could > well want to change, in which case I don’t think this is a concern. Yes, this particular change would be harmless. But you don't need `org-edit-special' to change that. Moreover you cannot allow this without allowing any change. So, let's not do that. > To be honest I don’t quite see this point, in both cases it’s just > a LaTeX buffer… No, it's not. It is a part of an Org document that happens to be handled by LaTeX. IOW, there is context around the object that doesn't belong to LaTeX. `org-edit-special' focuses on contents, not structure. For example, you cannot change the number of the footnote definition being edited from `org-edit-special'. This should also be the case here.
