Timothy <tecos...@gmail.com> writes: > I have only a basic working understanding, but my impression was that > in functioned as a 'best of both worlds' type thing.
I don't understand what would be the best of HTML email in that case. You're neither inlining any image, nor using any fancy presentation. Yet, your email is twice as big as it could be. In this mailing list, and probably in others, too, HTML email is just a waste of space.
