Aaron Ecay <aarone...@gmail.com> writes: > Are you missing a close paren at the end of the above line?
It evaluates and works ok, so I think it's ok. > Also, shouldn’t calc-eval take a string as an argument, not a lisp > form? (I’m asking based on the docstring, I don’t know the calc API at > all). 1) It was like this before. 2) It works. 3) calc-eval calls calc-do-calc-eval on this argument and the code there does a dispatch on expression, so I think it's safe to assume it's not actually a string (calc is a mess, yep).
