"Eddward DeVilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> ,---- >> | #+BEGIN_HTML >> | #+BEGIN_LaTeX >> | #+BEGIN_TXT >> | #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE >> | #+BEGIN myblock >> `---- > > I know. I don't care for these. There really only useful if you are > exporting.
For the #+BEGIN_* you're right. But dynamic blocks are useful for doing anything (clock reports, etc.) - not only exporting. > (By that I mean they are ugly (in my opinion) in the org-buffer.) Ugly but useful :/ > I'd rather see a way to mark things up so they are meaningful in the > buffer as well as export. Hence my proposal to refactor these directives and only use the dynamic block feature. When a block should be dynamically handled would depend on the associated function, not on the directive itself. > I may be a little quick on the knee jerk. In buffer markup recently > got a little weaker and I'd like for it not to be over looked with the > expectation that you can just use inline html or latex. Right, understood! -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
