On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:50:20AM -0600, Russell Adams wrote: > > I definite agree with that. I, too, primarily use org-mode for the > > way things > > look in Emacs. I occasionally export but my main use is within emacs. > > > > Thanks, > > Ed
Same here. A legible and easy to type .org format is very important for me. > I guess I'm missing the point. Optional tags to improve syntax > highlighting in code snippets or to improve export wouldn't affect how > your buffers look inside Emacs. You aren't obligated to use them. ;] It *is* possible to simultaneously achieve beautiful clean text with non-obtrusive semantic markup, and keep good flexibility in export format options; reStructuredText is living proof of this: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/ref/rst/introduction.html Compare the following documents: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/quickstart.html http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/quickstart.txt I would *love* to see orgmode reuse more of these great ideas. > On the flip side as a frequent exporter, I welcome anything that can > help unobtrusively improve the quality of the output. Adding syntax > highlighting in export, or a simple way to escape code metacharacters > would be of great benefit to me. > > I've recently gotten completely hooked on the Latex exporter. The > ability to turn an org outline from my project notes into a > professional looking PDF with bookmarks is invaluable! All that with > zero time spent formatting on my part. Hear hear, agreed on all accounts! _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
