Xiao-Yong Jin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Eddward DeVilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I feel tempted to bring up my suggestion of [markup|text] format >> again, but I've been resisting because I feel like a develish nag. So >> [*|at-syntax] could still be html specific if you really want >> something html specific, but there would be something that could be >> portable to all export formats. It would just be a matter of deciding >> what 'org' marks should be supported and making sure exporters try to >> support them. And of course there are other ways to get around *at >> syntax*. > > I would vote against heavily mark-up format like that. I > guess the original design of org-mode is to make a simple > text file that can make personal information organization > much simpler in emacs, as opposed to those half-mark-up > languages like emacs-muse.
FWIW, I second this. -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
