On Mar 22, 2007, at 17:45, Jason F. McBrayer wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Mar 22, 2007, at 16:21, Jason F. McBrayer wrote:
I'm not sure what would be better. But this reminds me that we
need a tty compatibility binding for org-shiftcontrolright and
org-shiftcontrolleft.
Arrrrgh. Yes. Proposals?????
Well, the relatively difficult key combination C-c C-x <right> is
bound to the relatively common org-shiftright, whereas C-c <right> is
unbound. Would it make sense to move org-shiftright to C-c <right>
and org-shiftcontrolright to C-c C-x <right> (and similar for the
other things on S-<directions>)? Would make editing timestamps
marginally less painful on a tty, as well. Unless these are being
reserved for some reason?
I don't think so, and I like the proposal. Thanks.
- Carsten
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Jason F. McBrayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| If someone conquers a thousand times a thousand others in |
| battle, and someone else conquers himself, the latter one |
| is the greatest of all conquerors. --- The Dhammapada |
--
Carsten Dominik
Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek"
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Kruislaan 403
NL-1098SJ Amsterdam
phone: +31 20 525 7477
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
