It looks like there might some more discussion here, but I'd like to chime in and say I kinda like what you have done with the multiple sequences. Of course, I'm not using some of the more advanced features such as logging state changes. For my simple use of TODO items, this is pretty nice.
The way I see it, I can have a sequence for simple todos, one for fuller projects, one for wishlist/investigation/bug-report items and so on. I'd use C-S-arrow to set the sequence type. S-arrow as usual while working and (possibly) C-S-arrow to promote say a wish-list item into a project. Heck, could I even have a single state sequence CANCEL for the missing not-done done state? Edd On 3/21/07, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 21, 2007, at 11:21, Leo wrote: > I feel this too complicated. First, I don't think it is complicated at all, try it out. I have already gotten used to it: C-S-right to select the right sequence initially. After that, everything works exactly as before. My description sounds complicated because I listed all the commands that are can be used, but you really only need these two. > Isn't it more intuitive and consistent to > make this work like #+CATEGORY and #+ARCHIVE? To be honest, I don't think this makes sense in this case, my suspicion is that you would get many more #+SEQ_TODO lines in a real-life buffer than #+CATEGORY lines. So I think this solution is much more general and workable. Lets see what other people have to say about it. Thanks for the feedback. - Carsten _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
_______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
