Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mar 22, 2007, at 16:21, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: >> I'm not sure what would be better. But this reminds me that we >> need a tty compatibility binding for org-shiftcontrolright and >> org-shiftcontrolleft. > > Arrrrgh. Yes. Proposals?????
Well, the relatively difficult key combination C-c C-x <right> is bound to the relatively common org-shiftright, whereas C-c <right> is unbound. Would it make sense to move org-shiftright to C-c <right> and org-shiftcontrolright to C-c C-x <right> (and similar for the other things on S-<directions>)? Would make editing timestamps marginally less painful on a tty, as well. Unless these are being reserved for some reason? -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Jason F. McBrayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | If someone conquers a thousand times a thousand others in | | battle, and someone else conquers himself, the latter one | | is the greatest of all conquerors. --- The Dhammapada | _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
