Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thank you very much, but this is a bit tricky, so maybe I should do > this.
I'd guess it would be better for you to do it. I had a look at what would be involved, and a working change would touch a lot more places in the file than I thought it would, and I don't feel confident that I'd get it right. > If you send me a complex patch, we need to get your papers with the > FSF first, or I cannot install the fixes into Emacs. I already have > the papers from David and Piotr, so if you plan to contribute code > in the future, maybe we should go ahead and do this. Why don't we wait until I actually contribute something useful ;) > There is one difference. When everything is in one line, I'd expect > C-c C-t to reach these states. When they are in different lines, > you will need C-S-right to get to them. Both ways have their > advantages. I guess for a special state like CANCELED, a separate > sequence would be good, but I can imagine cases where one would > like different ways of saying an entry is done. I'm not sure what would be better. But this reminds me that we need a tty compatibility binding for org-shiftcontrolright and org-shiftcontrolleft. -- +-----------------------------------------------------------+ | Jason F. McBrayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | If someone conquers a thousand times a thousand others in | | battle, and someone else conquers himself, the latter one | | is the greatest of all conquerors. --- The Dhammapada | _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
