Thanks Jack! I have a choke, but have never felt I needed one in 7 yrs of 
operating the ladder dipole, but I am eliminating all variables. Will hook it 
up and check the video/artticle. But if the tuners are damaged, I won't know it 
= same results.
Ref your earlier reply - thanks very much - [Hey, Lake Charles is on my bucket 
list, long story hihi] Could the tuner could be hot switching..? I have the PTT 
inhibit RCA cord between the KPA, so it should be inhibited during xmit.
I have gone through my antenna systems, even to the point where I replaced the 
RG-8 and the antenna. The MFJ analyzer said the coax was marginal so now its 
coiled in the garage.
The PL-259s are shiny and clean and under several wraps of vulcanizing tape. 
Then I wasn't happy with the homebrew G5RV and bought a commercial NI4L super 
G55RV/ZB6BKW. Tunes every time with the radio ATU, KAT500 not so happy but 
liked it six months ago..
Nothing changed, not even a 90 degree adapter. Very odd. I don't want a no 
fault found from Watsonville but this is making me tear my hair out. Might even 
ready to write another $1000 check.
//dave
WB7ELY
 
On 07/19/2025 5:29 PM PDT Jack Brindle <[email protected]> wrote:
 
 
One other thing that I am surprised that K9YC has not mentioned. In the G5RV, 
the 450 ohm ladder line (don’t use 300 ohm line) connected directly to the 
coax. That sets up a situation where return currents may be flowing on the 
outside of the coax shield. Which is really bad. The coax needs to have a choke 
at that point. You can wind the coax through a fairly large toroid to do the 
job (as many as you can put on the toroid). The best source of information for 
this is K9YC’s site - he has a Choke Cookbook that is a must read for this 
topic. Jim spent many hours doing extensive research on this very topic, and 
has published the results of all that research. And, it is free! See: 
http://audiosystemsgroup.com/2018Cookbook-Pacificon2021.pdf
While you are at it, you might look over the various presentations that Jim has 
made available. The main site is at: http://audiosystemsgroup.com/publish.htm
And, Jim is here to answer our questions. He is one of the guys I miss since 
moving away from 6-land.
 
73,
Jack, W6FB
 


On Jul 19, 2025, at 7:11 PM, Jack Brindle via Elecraft 
<[email protected]> wrote:
Ladder-line? THAT is an important piece of information. Open wire line is 
great. It is very hard to get these days. Almost as great is ladder line. I use 
a lot of it. It has one pretty big problem - when it gets wet, its impedance 
characteristics change. When that happens you will need to retune. I say this 
with a lot of experience. In this case it is not the ATU, but definitely the 
ladder line.

I will say for the second time, there are NO reed relays in the KAT500 or 
KPA500. I am very familiar with those relays. They can carry lots of power, but 
do not take kindly to being hot-switched. My KPA500 code makes sure they are 
not hot-switched, and I know the code in the KAT500 performs the same way. When 
we need to break the PTT line to the amplifier, we use a smaller relay that 
handles the very low current signaling of the PTT line. And yes, we do negate 
the PTT/Key line if SWR gets out of range.

Third, you should be using about 20 watts to tune the KAT500. It performs best 
at that level. In any case, be sure to read the KAt500 manual - it tells you 
the correct specs and how you should handle things. Also, while it is a good 
idea, there is no need to tune the KAT with the KPA500 in STBY. The KAT500 
always opens the PTT line when a tune is requested, which directly puts the KPA 
into low-power mode where it is not amplifying. This assumes, of course, that 
you are using the proper control cables to connect the transceiver to the 
KAT500, then to the KPA500. Again, read and follow the manuals.

You _could_ have a problem with the KAT500s, but if both behave the same, it is 
probably not them. As much as we hate going through our antenna systems, that 
is a must in this case. You really don’t want to send the KATs back to 
Watsonville only to have them returned with no trouble found along with a 
repair and shipping bill. Take the time to make sure your antennas really are 
in good shape. We get lots of reports on this one, and pretty much every time 
the ham ends up finding something deficient in the antenna system. Just because 
something works well at 100 watts, does not mean it will at 500. And yes, 
pretty much everyone who upgrades to an amplifier (including me) found this out 
the hard way. I learned the lesson and fixed my antennas properly, and still 
use the very first KPA500 many years after we first powered it up. It is a 
great amplifier!

73,
Jack, W6FB
KPA500 firmware developer and engineer of other devices…


On Jul 19, 2025, at 11:35 AM, dave ingebright via Elecraft 
<[email protected]> wrote:

Jim, Thanks for your query. I'm tuning at less than 10W, KPA amp always in 
STBY. Sometimes the tuner finds a better match at a little more power (25-75 
Watts); someone else mentioned that, too.
But again, yesterday, it found the solution (Multiband ladder-fed G5RV at 40') 
14Mhz, and everything was fine during the first part of the FT8 QSO, and then 
the tuner went to a high SWR fault for no apparent reason.
I reset it, and it was fine for the rest of the operating session. It doesn't 
matter what band or what power. Remember, I have two of these doing the same 
thing.
I still bet there are a couple of little reed relays with pitted contacts in 
the auto tuner. I am sure a lot of us have wondered how they get away with 
using those in a ~500W high-voltage environment. I will call the tech line, but 
wondered if any of you on this reflector have had this problem
//dave
WB7ELY
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected] 

Reply via email to