On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 09:39 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Aug 3 2007, Charles Marcus wrote: > > >On that we agree... and certainly, if there *is* something that dovecot > >can do to make things easier - by all means, tell Timo - as I said (and > >should be obvious) - he is more than willing to make dovecot better, > >especially if it can be done without too much trouble (I wasn't kidding > >or being smart when I asked the OP if he knew of anything that could be > >done better)... > > Yep! I know. I actually did bring this up on the list a while back (June > 18) and then followed-up with a proposed patch (June 20). Haven't heard > anything about it, but I wasn't worried since obviously it's not the > highest priority, behind fixes for the 1.0.x versions and 1.1 development > and such. :)
I think I did something about that, or at least about a similar problem for v1.1. LIST/LSUB code in general has been pretty much rewritten in it.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
