So, does this mean just change it manually if editing the WIKI, or, can
something be done to do a quick database update (as if anything done to
a production server is quick... test test test test, ok, now do it).
On 02/23/2014 01:51 PM, Dave wrote:
Fully agree - Apache OpenOffice sounds great anyway.
On 23 February 2014 19:05, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote:
On 13/02/2014 De Angela Jackson wrote:
Hi. I was just reading the thread. I thought using AOO instead of OO was
strictly due to Apache not owning the original licensing.
Just to clarify (since this is a publicly archived list): Apache does own
the "OpenOffice.org" trademark, see the site footer of
http://openoffice.org
So we (in the sense of "the Apache OpenOffice project") can perfectly use
"OpenOffice.org". But the product was renamed into "Apache OpenOffice", so
in information that is still current (as in "OpenOffice.org is an office
suite") we'd better use the latter ("Apache OpenOffice is an office suite").
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org
--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org
