Hi. I was just reading the thread. I thought using AOO instead of OO was strictly due to Apache not owning the original licensing. So although verbose, it might be necssary.
Just a thought. De Angela On Wednesday, February 12, 2014, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: > >> If the intent is to change OOo to AOO, if I could change the pages at 3 >> minutes per page, it would take 6 days of solid work to change them all. >> Could this be done during a maintenance cycle? >> > > Sure, this is best done automatically, directly on the server. But I don't > see a real reason for being so verbose and always using "Apache OpenOffice" > instead of the normal "OpenOffice". > > I believe the internal product name is set to "OpenOffice", and we have a > "long product name" set to "Apache OpenOffice" for some occurrences in the > interface. > > Anyway, whatever is agreed upon, once we agree this is a task to be > handled by a global "search and replace" in database. > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
