In my eyes (or ears) AOO stands out much more strongly than just the OO
On 13 February 2014 20:32, De Angela Jackson <deangela.m.jack...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi. I was just reading the thread. I thought using AOO instead of OO was > strictly due to Apache not owning the original licensing. So although > verbose, it might be necssary. > > Just a thought. > > De Angela > > On Wednesday, February 12, 2014, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote: > > > >> If the intent is to change OOo to AOO, if I could change the pages at 3 > >> minutes per page, it would take 6 days of solid work to change them all. > >> Could this be done during a maintenance cycle? > >> > > > > Sure, this is best done automatically, directly on the server. But I > don't > > see a real reason for being so verbose and always using "Apache > OpenOffice" > > instead of the normal "OpenOffice". > > > > I believe the internal product name is set to "OpenOffice", and we have a > > "long product name" set to "Apache OpenOffice" for some occurrences in > the > > interface. > > > > Anyway, whatever is agreed upon, once we agree this is a task to be > > handled by a global "search and replace" in database. > > > > Regards, > > Andrea. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > >
