Fully agree - Apache OpenOffice sounds great anyway.
On 23 February 2014 19:05, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > On 13/02/2014 De Angela Jackson wrote: > >> Hi. I was just reading the thread. I thought using AOO instead of OO was >> strictly due to Apache not owning the original licensing. >> > > Just to clarify (since this is a publicly archived list): Apache does own > the "OpenOffice.org" trademark, see the site footer of > http://openoffice.org > > So we (in the sense of "the Apache OpenOffice project") can perfectly use > "OpenOffice.org". But the product was renamed into "Apache OpenOffice", so > in information that is still current (as in "OpenOffice.org is an office > suite") we'd better use the latter ("Apache OpenOffice is an office suite"). > > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: doc-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: doc-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
