It appears that Shane Kerr <sh...@time-travellers.org> said: >>>> Since I noticed the ZONEVERSION RFC 9660, I was thinking that this >>>> could be extended to include a version at the database. >> I think this is prime example of a Private Use value. It would be >> specific to SIDN implementation and does not need any code assignment. >> Just do it! > >I think the idea is that this might be widely-used enough to benefit >from standardization, rather than using a Private Use value. > >I guess it depends exactly on the semantics, but having an actual >timestamp available for a zone seems generally useful.
You have to know what kind of version numbers the database uses to know what the value means. I agree this is a private extension. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
