Petr,
On 07/11/2024 11.23, Petr Špaček wrote:
On 06. 11. 24 9:09, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 09:13:26AM +0100,
Stefan Ubbink <Stefan.Ubbink=40sidn...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote
a message of 69 lines which said:
Since I noticed the ZONEVERSION RFC 9660, I was thinking that this
could be extended to include a version at the database.
Yes, good idea. It will require adding an entry in the "TYPE Values
Registry" (policy is "Specification Required" and, apparently, an
Internet-Draft is not sufficient)
I think this is prime example of a Private Use value. It would be
specific to SIDN implementation and does not need any code assignment.
Just do it!
I think the idea is that this might be widely-used enough to benefit
from standardization, rather than using a Private Use value.
I guess it depends exactly on the semantics, but having an actual
timestamp available for a zone seems generally useful.
Cheers,
--
Shane
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-le...@ietf.org
