Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> writes: > Yup, lame delegation and lame server are still in very common use —
That doesn't mean it should be. > and (IMO) it's usually clear from context what is being > communicated. Having been historically (and likely futurely) confused by the term, I disagree. It is not clear at all to anyone new to the DNS what "lame" means I suspect we could switch to better terminology. Will it disappear tomorrow? No, of course not. But if servers start spitting out different log messages and we generally use more accurate terminology in our conversations then I believe understandably will go up from where it is now. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
