On Apr 11, 2023, at 3:06 PM, Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote: > > No one proposed to retire the term?
Not yet, I believe. > If unclear and additionally inappropriate from an inclusive language point of > view, why not document the term as is, with a note explaining it is > incomplete (without trying to fix it) and calling the term historic? The term is not "historic" in the sense that it is still in active use, albeit with somewhat different definitions depending on the speaker or reader. Ecouraging people to not use it is fine, but maybe out of place for a terminology document. If you disagree, please propose the wording you would like to see in the document. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
