On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:39 AM John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
> In article <CABcZeBNT9Wf2HxLDHR=tLod4YVgF-E=uaU7+=9nGLk= > 01gd...@mail.gmail.com> you write: > >> Yes. Leveraging the fact that the IETF community is in fact a community > >> seems worth the effort to have the references in registries be useful > to a > >> new developer a decade in the future. > > > >OK. In that case you and I disagree. > > > >My reasoning is that (as above) these algorithms are generally of low > >interest and that requiring community review for code point registration > >has the result of consuming quite scarce resources in the service of > making > >the algorithms which are being registered marginally clearer. ... > > Sounds like expert review would be more appropriate, so only one > person has to spend cycles deciding whether the spec looks plausible. > As I said, even that turns out to be quite a bit of work, depending on what you think "plausible" means. If you review for "there appears to be something vaguely formatted like a spec at this location", then sure. If you mean "is this implementable", let alone secure, then it's pretty far from easy. -Ekr > > R's, > John >
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
