On Jun 18, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Dmitry Belyavsky <beld...@gmail.com> wrote: > The 2nd registry > Delegation Signer (DS) Resource Record (RR) Type Digest Algorithms > (https://www.iana.org/assignments/ds-rr-types/ds-rr-types.xhtml#ds-rr-types-1 > <https://www.iana.org/assignments/ds-rr-types/ds-rr-types.xhtml#ds-rr-types-1>) > has the "Standards Action" update policy
I had forgotten that the DS registry is "standards action". This document shows why that was a bad idea. It might be better, and faster, for this WG to adopt a one-paragraph draft that makes the DS registry "RFC required", like the other DNSSEC-related registries. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
